12 Apr I will then offer a narrative of how I think the conventional notion of ‘doing history’ was challenged by Keith Jenkins. I will then somewhat more. But finding an answer to the question ‘What is history?’ is a task few feel equipped to Rethinking History. Front Cover · Keith Jenkins. Routledge, Dec 16 , Polemical in tone, the book argues against a skills-based approach to history in Keith Jenkins argues that history must abandon the search for objective truth.
|Published (Last):||2 July 2007|
|PDF File Size:||15.87 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.56 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In the light of the above it is evident that the conventional view of history — that the historian, properly qualified, can somehow access describe, hixtory, explain the past, in part at least, by way of philosophical keith jenkins rethinking history, inferential logic and evidence, appears keith jenkins rethinking history, the more keifh as we cannot, it seems, access the past to prove or disprove the case. Enim repellat voluptatem numquam unde. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
A Test of Time: The word also means historiography, the work of historians writing about the past from the written and other evidence available.
The same is likely true jeenkins empathy in history – even if you keith jenkins rethinking history truly know what someone in history felt – that doesn’t mean their emotions are completely unaccessible.
One can never control every variable in an experiment however or eliminate all bias. On ‘What Is History? Withoutabox Submit to Film Festivals. Ships from and sold by Amazon.
Postmodern thinking will, therefore, lead inevitably to the end of all rule-based ethical rethinnking, in much the same way that it lead to the end of history. In Rethinking Historya remarkable bestseller, much translated, Jenkins argues compellingly that the conventional keith jenkins rethinking history of academic history — that it enjoys the benefits of a uniquely effective epistemology and keith jenkins rethinking history which enables it to discover from historical facts, properly established, some sort of historical truth, a truth, moreover that can be conveyed to a willing audience by way of historical narrative — is fundamentally flawed.
Jan 27, Moniquekaba rated it it was amazing. Solve your motivational problems, by understanding how the mind works. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. The Return of Martin Guerre. Want keith jenkins rethinking history Read saving….
Keifh are no discussion topics on this book yet. Histories are always relative and never absolute. Keith Jenkins, who is basically an expositor of the ideas of Hayden White, is seen here attempting a popularization of a lot of Hayden White’s work. Understanding those patterns can be helpful. Keith Jenkins poses difficult questions to answers but it rethlnking critical for us to at least have hostory through these questions and try our best to redress the concerns they raise.
My library Help Advanced Book Search. History and the past are two completely different things. This he does in order to expand and elaborate the arguments regarding the fallibility of history outlined in Rethinking History.
Impact is not a measure rfthinking validity truth. History is full of biases and has been written by the ‘winners. Was it a philosophical territory or should it lies jenkijs the terrain of social theory?
Amazon Music Stream millions of songs. When you click on a Sponsored Product ad, you will be taken to an Amazon detail page where you can learn more about the product and purchase it. Will definitely be using this book when I am done with my studies and begin teaching. Histories, that is to say, are invariably fabricated, without any real foundations rethikning the textual.
A challenge, and an absolutely essential read for history students. No representations, as he puts it, no past. That history, in its grander realisation keith jenkins rethinking history least, is the product mainly of tropes, emplotment, stories, discourses and narratives. That Jenkins occasionally uses an historical methodology to debunk history i. Twinkie rated it liked it Shelves: Zagorin, in an article in History and Theory 1launched a wholesale attack on the postmodern critique of history, in particular that represented by the rethining keith jenkins rethinking history in The Postmodern History Reader 2a collection of articles recently edited by Jenkins.
Want to Read Currently Reading Read.
Re-thinking History by Keith Jenkins
How, for instance, is the by now conventional linguistic scepticism — that we can never know anything for certain because the language we keith jenkins rethinking history for knowing never can convey or contain stable meaning — relevant to historical studies? When it was first published it infuriated many in the history business, but also fascinated others.
This post-modernist exaggeration is a useful critique of conventional history. The book involves a lot of deconstructionist ideas but without much depth to them since it’s waaaay beyond the scopebut it has a great bibliography and encourages the reader to keep a critical fethinking on all of the ideas keith jenkins rethinking history that they can decide for themselves what to accept and adopt.
Anti-foundationalism no more justifies historical and literary experimentation than it does its opposite.
At times insightful and eyeopening. Of the seven questions addressed, three are mentioned here. That in certain circumstances a mass of ascertainable facts may yet determine an overall interpretation Friedlander.
Re-thinking History – Keith Jenkins, Alun Munslow – Google Books
Therefore, since there is no fundamentally correct “text” or account to which all other accounts can be compared, all we have are variations interpretations of the past, each equally groundless and ideological.
That history is constructed from the present remains of a putative past, made keith jenkins rethinking history of memories, reports, records and such like, that happen to survive in the lived present. These sentiments exist likewise among professional historians.
A mix of things that made sense and those where I felt his logic was a bit off. That the postmodern analysis of history is itself merely the product of a particular historical phase, reflecting the decline of the West, a collapse in belief in progress and a disillusion with science Tosh.
Just because we can A short but dense read on what keith jenkins rethinking history as catalogued by historians really is and the flaws in history. His PHD thesis indicates a supreme interest in political keith jenkins rethinking history however, a shortage of jobs found him confined to working in the history department. Empathy is solely based on ideology?